| HITTING PERCENTAGE |
S |
K |
E |
TA |
Pct. |
| 1. |
Furman |
56 |
762 |
289 |
2006 |
.236 |
| 2. |
ETSU |
60 |
790 |
291 |
2196 |
.227 |
| 3. |
Wofford |
63 |
825 |
374 |
2166 |
.208 |
| 4. |
Western Carolina |
64 |
803 |
300 |
2482 |
.203 |
| 5. |
UNCG |
68 |
886 |
375 |
2580 |
.198 |
| 6. |
Mercer |
60 |
728 |
299 |
2209 |
.194 |
| 7. |
Samford |
64 |
800 |
356 |
2358 |
.188 |
| 8. |
Chattanooga |
65 |
810 |
386 |
2427 |
.175 |
| 9. |
The Citadel |
60 |
689 |
370 |
2163 |
.147 |
| Opponent Hitting Pct. |
S |
K |
E |
TA |
Pct. |
| 1. |
ETSU |
60 |
671 |
357 |
2153 |
.146 |
| 2. |
Furman |
56 |
700 |
341 |
2123 |
.169 |
| 3. |
UNCG |
68 |
843 |
370 |
2538 |
.186 |
| 4. |
Wofford |
63 |
740 |
322 |
2184 |
.191 |
| 5. |
Chattanooga |
65 |
798 |
344 |
2310 |
.197 |
| 6. |
Samford |
64 |
797 |
333 |
2310 |
.201 |
| 7. |
Western Carolina |
64 |
953 |
395 |
2632 |
.212 |
| 8. |
The Citadel |
60 |
780 |
286 |
2119 |
.233 |
| 9. |
Mercer |
60 |
811 |
292 |
2218 |
.234 |
| ASSISTS |
S |
No. |
Avg/S |
| 1. |
Furman |
56 |
732 |
13.07 |
| 2. |
ETSU |
60 |
736 |
12.27 |
| 3. |
Wofford |
63 |
772 |
12.25 |
| 4. |
UNCG |
68 |
828 |
12.18 |
| 5. |
Samford |
64 |
768 |
12.00 |
| 6. |
Chattanooga |
65 |
777 |
11.95 |
| 7. |
Western Carolina |
64 |
743 |
11.61 |
| 8. |
Mercer |
60 |
686 |
11.43 |
| 9. |
The Citadel |
60 |
641 |
10.68 |
| KILLS |
S |
No. |
Avg/S |
| 1. |
Furman |
56 |
762 |
13.61 |
| 2. |
ETSU |
60 |
790 |
13.17 |
| 3. |
Wofford |
63 |
825 |
13.10 |
| 4. |
UNCG |
68 |
886 |
13.03 |
| 5. |
Western Carolina |
64 |
803 |
12.55 |
| 6. |
Samford |
64 |
800 |
12.50 |
| 7. |
Chattanooga |
65 |
810 |
12.46 |
| 8. |
Mercer |
60 |
728 |
12.13 |
| 9. |
The Citadel |
60 |
689 |
11.48 |
| BLOCKS |
S |
BS |
BA |
Total |
Avg/S |
| 1. |
ETSU |
60 |
25 |
262 |
156.0 |
2.60 |
| 2. |
Western Carolina |
64 |
44 |
212 |
150.0 |
2.34 |
| 3. |
UNCG |
68 |
28 |
221 |
138.5 |
2.04 |
| 4. |
Wofford |
63 |
25 |
204 |
127.0 |
2.02 |
| 5. |
Furman |
56 |
38 |
142 |
109.0 |
1.95 |
| 6. |
The Citadel |
60 |
10 |
201 |
110.5 |
1.84 |
| 7. |
Chattanooga |
65 |
23 |
186 |
116.0 |
1.78 |
| 8. |
Samford |
64 |
23 |
176 |
111.0 |
1.73 |
| 9. |
Mercer |
60 |
20 |
136 |
88.0 |
1.47 |
| SERVICE ACES |
S |
No. |
Avg/S |
| 1. |
Furman |
56 |
74 |
1.32 |
| 2. |
Samford |
64 |
82 |
1.28 |
| 3. |
Wofford |
63 |
79 |
1.25 |
| 4. |
Chattanooga |
65 |
81 |
1.25 |
| 5. |
The Citadel |
60 |
69 |
1.15 |
| 6. |
ETSU |
60 |
68 |
1.13 |
| 7. |
Mercer |
60 |
63 |
1.05 |
| 8. |
UNCG |
68 |
71 |
1.04 |
| 9. |
Western Carolina |
64 |
58 |
0.91 |
| DIGS |
S |
No. |
Avg/S |
| 1. |
Western Carolina |
64 |
1102 |
17.22 |
| 2. |
Furman |
56 |
949 |
16.95 |
| 3. |
UNCG |
68 |
1145 |
16.84 |
| 4. |
Samford |
64 |
1052 |
16.44 |
| 5. |
ETSU |
60 |
977 |
16.28 |
| 6. |
Mercer |
60 |
965 |
16.08 |
| 7. |
Chattanooga |
65 |
1039 |
15.98 |
| 8. |
Wofford |
63 |
944 |
14.98 |
| 9. |
The Citadel |
60 |
882 |
14.70 |
|